Khmers in South East Asian History

#387133Avatar of KhmerKhomKhmerKhom
Posted 1 year, 5 months ago

What do you think of some of these new theories of Khoms?

Back info

http://khmerization.blogspot.com/2009/09/who-is-khom-and-who-is-khmer.html

edit: this is the correct link

http://khmerization.blogspot.com/2010/09/who-are-khom.html

Summarized arguments for Angkor Khom origins:

1)Syam were the rulers of Angkor
2)Old Khmer was actually a Syamese language
3)Angkor was not the capital of Khmer Empire, but rather the capital of Khoms at one point.
4)Khmer never ruled Angkor until 1336.
5)Kambuja =/= Khmer as inscriptions doesn’t note the word Khmer until the 12th century
6)Khmer Empire is a fabrication of the French
7)Founan/Chenla were also Syam

Responses to these arguments?

[Message last modified 01-12-2012 05:26pm by KhmerKhom]

#387142Avatar of ah_ghoah_gho
Posted 1 year, 5 months ago

Wrong wrong and WRONG!

Legends and ancient alien theorists say Angkor was built by a celestial race from the stars with advanced technology and were giants.

From the stars…advanced technology… giants…?

TRANSFORMERS!

#387149Avatar of KhmerKhomKhmerKhom
Posted 1 year, 5 months ago

lol lets not be facetious and keep this discussion scholarly.

#387155Avatar of Tidus77Tidus77
Posted 1 year, 5 months ago

They better not be teaching this BS in school or Javeraman gonna kicking some a$$.

#387161Avatar of PhnomKlarSarPhnomKlarSar
Posted 1 year, 5 months ago

It seem the westside people trying to rewrite Khmer history and show us our own history lmao.

#387167Avatar of KhmerKhomKhmerKhom
Posted 1 year, 5 months ago

Are any of you fine gents members at AF? The discussion there have been quite exhilarating.

#387172Avatar of Anonymous
Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

They are delusional.

[i]Originally posted by KhmerKhom[/i]
What do you think of some of these new theories of Khoms?

Back info

http://khmerization.blogspot.com/2009/09/who-is-khom-and-who-is-khmer.html

edit: this is the correct link

http://khmerization.blogspot.com/2010/09/who-are-khom.html

Summarized arguments for Angkor Khom origins:

1)Syam were the rulers of Angkor
2)Old Khmer was actually a Syamese language
3)Angkor was not the capital of Khmer Empire, but rather the capital of Khoms at one point.
4)Khmer never ruled Angkor until 1336.
5)Kambuja =/= Khmer as inscriptions doesn’t note the word Khmer until the 12th century
6)Khmer Empire is a fabrication of the French
7)Founan/Chenla were also Syam

Responses to these arguments?

[Message last modified 01-12-2012 05:26pm by KhmerKhom]

#387179Avatar of bearbear
Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

written records of made who did what and when, were left all over ruins
in Thailand Laos Burma etc. Those stele and tablet were written
in old Khmer language. To say otherwise is one big Thai lie. They have no shame- those bastards!

Yes I saw the baseless article n claim were written by Thai professor. Go figure. Freak jerk.

#387192Avatar of chimera7chimera7
Posted 1 year, 4 months ago

Hullo from a new member. I’m interested in the Hindu region and gave a talk at the 2nd Hindu Conference in Sydney. Although there is little definite information about its history, some new evidence has appeared. A big picture is getting bigger.