XBOX vs PS3

Latest Forums The Chatterbox XBOX vs PS3

This topic contains 84 replies, has 0 voices, and was last updated by  Legends 6 years, 11 months ago.

Viewing 25 posts - 51 through 75 (of 85 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #290162
    Profile photo of
    Anonymous
    • Posts: 7768

    What you’ve listed is not worth my 50 bucks a year. Actually, some of them are not a ‘good’ thing. Those movie rentals, tv shows, music videos, demos, etc. are all of them free or it’ll cost you more money to buy those features? Microsoft is just milking your money. I’ll rather watch a TV show on my TV. All I have to do is click input or video on my remote to change it from game to television. I can youtube with my laptop etc already so no point. Also, some things you’ve listed on Xbox Live do also exist in the PS3 that you forgot to list, such as more add-on to the games.

    I really don’t see what you see. If you want to PAY for more things you have to PAY FOR later, then good for you. I just want to go online and play. Is there a feature like that on the Xbox 360?

    I gave you that link on yahoo answer to show you more unbiased point of views. You might not notice it but you do have a bias point of view, it makes you sound less credible.

    Originally posted by Soeun_Lang
    You got to be kidding with PS3’s online play being better than Xbox Live right? lol why are you posting a askyahoo site for a rebuttal? PS3’s online interface is horrible compared to Xbox Live. Xbox Live interface is really simple and intuitive, because everything is integrated into a dashboard. You could be playing a game, watching a movie, listening to music, and then your friend invites you into a game. All you have to do is press the guide button, accept the invite, and then put the disc in. It’ll bring you straight to his game.
    The same goes with voice chats, and messages, they are all integrated into the dash. Yes, you pay 49.99 a year but you get what you paid for.

    Xbox live

    XBLA (demos for every arcade game, classics, and originals)
    XNA
    Movie rentals
    TV shows
    Music Videos
    Original xbox games
    Community videos
    Tournaments
    137+ Demos
    Bigger online community
    In-game invites, messaging, private chat, music, download status.
    Automatic XBLA downloads
    Check friends status eg. what game there playing,what level there on etc…
    Feature rich interface, everythings sorted.
    More add-ons for games.
    Themes, gamerpics
    Download and PLAY demos (no installing)
    ETC ETC….
    SILVER MEMBERS HAVE ALL THESE FEATURES AND MORE BUT CAN’T PLAY GAMES ONLINE.

    PSN

    Free online play
    Website like store
    less content
    weak community
    no in-game features as standard
    online play is less personal
    BS friends list features (short bio, language, name, game playing)
    No official tournaments (that i no of)
    ps1 classics
    original games

    I’m not saying PSN won’t get better but as of right now. Xbox Live owns it! There’s even talks that PSN might redesign the whole online interface too.

    Things might change once PSN add these features though:

    1) In-Game Music and Messaging
    2) In-Game Browser
    3) Download-able movies
    4) Home

    Originally posted by agent0o5
    I think you did your math wrong. It’s PS3 Online play > Xbox Live.

    There’s really no $49.99 a year fee to play online on the PS3. That’s 50 bucks I can spend somewhere else. That’s a fact. I can play online whenever I feel like it. I would feel stupid if I paid a fee and end up never playing online because I don’t have the time to play.

    Here’s some more opinion, less-bias ones.

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080116030101AAeC2GG

    /quote]

    [Message last modified 02-27-2008 07:24pm by agent0o5]

    #290176
    Profile photo of Soeun_Lang
    Soeun_Lang
    Participant
    • Posts: 423

    Me? Bias? lol oh man I am far from a lemming and a cow. I’m a gamer and I play every game. Xbox Live has the most to offer gamers. Far greater numbers of players on Live and far way better interface. I haven’t bashed the PS3 in any way. I actually own a PS3 and judging from what I’ve played. Hands down Xbox Live is the better online experience and what you’ve posted are bias answers. I can easily find “opinions” on a gaming forum and prove to you how bad PSN sucks. Yes, you pay 49.99 a year but if you can’t afford, then you can happily go to PSN, but for the millions of gamers who are on it, they are enjoying it more than any online gaming experience (minus MMORPGs). You play a multiplatform game like Rainbow 6 or Call of Duty and you can easily tell that there are far more number of gamers on Xbox Live than PSN. Thats just the truth.

    [i]Originally posted by agent0o5[/i]
    What you’ve listed is not worth my 50 bucks a year. Actually, some of them are not a ‘good’ thing. Those movie rentals, tv shows, music videos, demos, etc. are all of them free or it’ll cost you more money to buy those features? Microsoft is just milking your money. I’ll rather watch a TV show on my TV. All I have to do is click input or video on my remote to change it from game to television. I can youtube with my laptop etc already so no point. Also, some things you’ve listed on Xbox Live do also exist in the PS3 that you forgot to list, such as more add-on to the games.

    I really don’t see what you see. If you want to PAY for more things you have to PAY FOR later, then good for you. I just want to go online and play. Is there a feature like that on the Xbox 360?

    I gave you that link on yahoo answer to show you more unbiased point of views. You might not notice it but you do have a bias point of view, it makes you sound less credible.

    [quote]
    [i]Originally posted by Soeun_Lang[/i]
    You got to be kidding with PS3’s online play being better than Xbox Live right? lol why are you posting a askyahoo site for a rebuttal? PS3’s online interface is horrible compared to Xbox Live. Xbox Live interface is really simple and intuitive, because everything is integrated into a dashboard. You could be playing a game, watching a movie, listening to music, and then your friend invites you into a game. All you have to do is press the guide button, accept the invite, and then put the disc in. It’ll bring you straight to his game.
    The same goes with voice chats, and messages, they are all integrated into the dash. Yes, you pay 49.99 a year but you get what you paid for.

    Xbox live

    XBLA (demos for every arcade game, classics, and originals)
    XNA
    Movie rentals
    TV shows
    Music Videos
    Original xbox games
    Community videos
    Tournaments
    137+ Demos
    Bigger online community
    In-game invites, messaging, private chat, music, download status.
    Automatic XBLA downloads
    Check friends status eg. what game there playing,what level there on etc…
    Feature rich interface, everythings sorted.
    More add-ons for games.
    Themes, gamerpics
    Download and PLAY demos (no installing)
    ETC ETC….
    SILVER MEMBERS HAVE ALL THESE FEATURES AND MORE BUT CAN’T PLAY GAMES ONLINE.

    PSN

    Free online play
    Website like store
    less content
    weak community
    no in-game features as standard
    online play is less personal
    BS friends list features (short bio, language, name, game playing)
    No official tournaments (that i no of)
    ps1 classics
    original games

    I’m not saying PSN won’t get better but as of right now. Xbox Live owns it! There’s even talks that PSN might redesign the whole online interface too.

    Things might change once PSN add these features though:

    1) In-Game Music and Messaging
    2) In-Game Browser
    3) Download-able movies
    4) Home

    [quote]
    [i]Originally posted by agent0o5[/i]
    I think you did your math wrong. It’s PS3 Online play > Xbox Live.

    There’s really no $49.99 a year fee to play online on the PS3. That’s 50 bucks I can spend somewhere else. That’s a fact. I can play online whenever I feel like it. I would feel stupid if I paid a fee and end up never playing online because I don’t have the time to play.

    Here’s some more opinion, less-bias ones.

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080116030101AAeC2GG

    /quote]

    [Message last modified 02-27-2008 07:24pm by agent0o5]

    #290187
    Profile photo of
    Anonymous
    • Posts: 7768

    Well, owning both systems do not make your opinions less bias. It’s apparent you have a love for the Xbox Live. I gave you pretty much an unbiased source. Yahoo answers just have random people answering questions. Most gaming sites depending on which gaming platform they favor will give you bias opinions.

    I never tried Xbox Live, but from what you’ve listed. I rather spend my 50 bucks on sandals. lol. I just don’t see the allure of it. Maybe you have to be an Xbox fanboy because I notice only Xbox fanboy only hardcore ones at least try to justify the 50 dollar a year fee. Hopefully, Sony can come through with their improvements and still stay free. They need to force Microsoft from ripping you guys off with this service.

    [i]Originally posted by Soeun_Lang[/i]
    Me? Bias? lol oh man I am far from a lemming and a cow. I’m a gamer and I play every game. Xbox Live has the most to offer gamers. Far greater numbers of players on Live and far way better interface. I haven’t bashed the PS3 in any way. I actually own a PS3 and judging from what I’ve played. Hands down Xbox Live is the better online experience and what you’ve posted are bias answers. I can easily find “opinions” on a gaming forum and prove to you how bad PSN sucks. Yes, you pay 49.99 a year but if you can’t afford, then you can happily go to PSN, but for the millions of gamers who are on it, they are enjoying it more than any online gaming experience (minus MMORPGs). You play a multiplatform game like Rainbow 6 or Call of Duty and you can easily tell that there are far more number of gamers on Xbox Live than PSN. Thats just the truth.
    [quote]
    [i]Originally posted by agent0o5[/i]
    What you’ve listed is not worth my 50 bucks a year. Actually, some of them are not a ‘good’ thing. Those movie rentals, tv shows, music videos, demos, etc. are all of them free or it’ll cost you more money to buy those features? Microsoft is just milking your money. I’ll rather watch a TV show on my TV. All I have to do is click input or video on my remote to change it from game to television. I can youtube with my laptop etc already so no point. Also, some things you’ve listed on Xbox Live do also exist in the PS3 that you forgot to list, such as more add-on to the games.

    I really don’t see what you see. If you want to PAY for more things you have to PAY FOR later, then good for you. I just want to go online and play. Is there a feature like that on the Xbox 360?

    I gave you that link on yahoo answer to show you more unbiased point of views. You might not notice it but you do have a bias point of view, it makes you sound less credible.

    [quote]
    [i]Originally posted by Soeun_Lang[/i]
    You got to be kidding with PS3’s online play being better than Xbox Live right? lol why are you posting a askyahoo site for a rebuttal? PS3’s online interface is horrible compared to Xbox Live. Xbox Live interface is really simple and intuitive, because everything is integrated into a dashboard. You could be playing a game, watching a movie, listening to music, and then your friend invites you into a game. All you have to do is press the guide button, accept the invite, and then put the disc in. It’ll bring you straight to his game.
    The same goes with voice chats, and messages, they are all integrated into the dash. Yes, you pay 49.99 a year but you get what you paid for.

    Xbox live

    XBLA (demos for every arcade game, classics, and originals)
    XNA
    Movie rentals
    TV shows
    Music Videos
    Original xbox games
    Community videos
    Tournaments
    137+ Demos
    Bigger online community
    In-game invites, messaging, private chat, music, download status.
    Automatic XBLA downloads
    Check friends status eg. what game there playing,what level there on etc…
    Feature rich interface, everythings sorted.
    More add-ons for games.
    Themes, gamerpics
    Download and PLAY demos (no installing)
    ETC ETC….
    SILVER MEMBERS HAVE ALL THESE FEATURES AND MORE BUT CAN’T PLAY GAMES ONLINE.

    PSN

    Free online play
    Website like store
    less content
    weak community
    no in-game features as standard
    online play is less personal
    BS friends list features (short bio, language, name, game playing)
    No official tournaments (that i no of)
    ps1 classics
    original games

    I’m not saying PSN won’t get better but as of right now. Xbox Live owns it! There’s even talks that PSN might redesign the whole online interface too.

    Things might change once PSN add these features though:

    1) In-Game Music and Messaging
    2) In-Game Browser
    3) Download-able movies
    4) Home

    [quote]
    [i]Originally posted by agent0o5[/i]
    I think you did your math wrong. It’s PS3 Online play > Xbox Live.

    There’s really no $49.99 a year fee to play online on the PS3. That’s 50 bucks I can spend somewhere else. That’s a fact. I can play online whenever I feel like it. I would feel stupid if I paid a fee and end up never playing online because I don’t have the time to play.

    Here’s some more opinion, less-bias ones.

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080116030101AAeC2GG

    /quote]

    [Message last modified 02-27-2008 07:24pm by agent0o5]

    [/quote]

    #290201
    Profile photo of Soeun_Lang
    Soeun_Lang
    Participant
    • Posts: 423

    LMAO!!!!!!!!!You totally got me!!!

    “I never tried Xbox Live”

    “I gave you pretty much an unbiased source. Yahoo answers just have random people answering questions.”

    IF you want credible gaming source then please refer to IGN, Gamespot, 1up, joystiq, or even gamepro.

    [i]Originally posted by agent0o5[/i]
    Well, owning both systems do not make your opinions less bias. It’s apparent you have a love for the Xbox Live. I gave you pretty much an unbiased source. Yahoo answers just have random people answering questions. Most gaming sites depending on which gaming platform they favor will give you bias opinions.

    I never tried Xbox Live, but from what you’ve listed. I rather spend my 50 bucks on sandals. lol. I just don’t see the allure of it. Maybe you have to be an Xbox fanboy because I notice only Xbox fanboy only hardcore ones at least try to justify the 50 dollar a year fee. Hopefully, Sony can come through with their improvements and still stay free. They need to force Microsoft from ripping you guys off with this service.

    [quote]
    [i]Originally posted by Soeun_Lang[/i]
    Me? Bias? lol oh man I am far from a lemming and a cow. I’m a gamer and I play every game. Xbox Live has the most to offer gamers. Far greater numbers of players on Live and far way better interface. I haven’t bashed the PS3 in any way. I actually own a PS3 and judging from what I’ve played. Hands down Xbox Live is the better online experience and what you’ve posted are bias answers. I can easily find “opinions” on a gaming forum and prove to you how bad PSN sucks. Yes, you pay 49.99 a year but if you can’t afford, then you can happily go to PSN, but for the millions of gamers who are on it, they are enjoying it more than any online gaming experience (minus MMORPGs). You play a multiplatform game like Rainbow 6 or Call of Duty and you can easily tell that there are far more number of gamers on Xbox Live than PSN. Thats just the truth.
    [quote]
    [i]Originally posted by agent0o5[/i]
    What you’ve listed is not worth my 50 bucks a year. Actually, some of them are not a ‘good’ thing. Those movie rentals, tv shows, music videos, demos, etc. are all of them free or it’ll cost you more money to buy those features? Microsoft is just milking your money. I’ll rather watch a TV show on my TV. All I have to do is click input or video on my remote to change it from game to television. I can youtube with my laptop etc already so no point. Also, some things you’ve listed on Xbox Live do also exist in the PS3 that you forgot to list, such as more add-on to the games.

    I really don’t see what you see. If you want to PAY for more things you have to PAY FOR later, then good for you. I just want to go online and play. Is there a feature like that on the Xbox 360?

    I gave you that link on yahoo answer to show you more unbiased point of views. You might not notice it but you do have a bias point of view, it makes you sound less credible.

    [quote]
    [i]Originally posted by Soeun_Lang[/i]
    You got to be kidding with PS3’s online play being better than Xbox Live right? lol why are you posting a askyahoo site for a rebuttal? PS3’s online interface is horrible compared to Xbox Live. Xbox Live interface is really simple and intuitive, because everything is integrated into a dashboard. You could be playing a game, watching a movie, listening to music, and then your friend invites you into a game. All you have to do is press the guide button, accept the invite, and then put the disc in. It’ll bring you straight to his game.
    The same goes with voice chats, and messages, they are all integrated into the dash. Yes, you pay 49.99 a year but you get what you paid for.

    Xbox live

    XBLA (demos for every arcade game, classics, and originals)
    XNA
    Movie rentals
    TV shows
    Music Videos
    Original xbox games
    Community videos
    Tournaments
    137+ Demos
    Bigger online community
    In-game invites, messaging, private chat, music, download status.
    Automatic XBLA downloads
    Check friends status eg. what game there playing,what level there on etc…
    Feature rich interface, everythings sorted.
    More add-ons for games.
    Themes, gamerpics
    Download and PLAY demos (no installing)
    ETC ETC….
    SILVER MEMBERS HAVE ALL THESE FEATURES AND MORE BUT CAN’T PLAY GAMES ONLINE.

    PSN

    Free online play
    Website like store
    less content
    weak community
    no in-game features as standard
    online play is less personal
    BS friends list features (short bio, language, name, game playing)
    No official tournaments (that i no of)
    ps1 classics
    original games

    I’m not saying PSN won’t get better but as of right now. Xbox Live owns it! There’s even talks that PSN might redesign the whole online interface too.

    Things might change once PSN add these features though:

    1) In-Game Music and Messaging
    2) In-Game Browser
    3) Download-able movies
    4) Home

    [quote]
    [i]Originally posted by agent0o5[/i]
    I think you did your math wrong. It’s PS3 Online play > Xbox Live.

    There’s really no $49.99 a year fee to play online on the PS3. That’s 50 bucks I can spend somewhere else. That’s a fact. I can play online whenever I feel like it. I would feel stupid if I paid a fee and end up never playing online because I don’t have the time to play.

    Here’s some more opinion, less-bias ones.

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080116030101AAeC2GG

    /quote]

    [Message last modified 02-27-2008 07:24pm by agent0o5]

    [/quote]
    [/quote]

    #290213
    Profile photo of
    Anonymous
    • Posts: 7768

    There’s no reason to for me to try Xbox Live. I’m all about opportunity cost. Not worth my 50 bucks.

    Gaming sites are credible when you want technical specs but not unbiased when you ask for opinions. Should I check Xbox 360 gaming source sites for Xbox Live opinions too? You’ll have those fanboys in there that will sway it one way or another. Just KC alone, I notice a lot of Xbox fanboys.

    Yahoo answers might not be ‘credible’ because they are not ‘experts’ but they are unbiased (as in no fanboys you will find in gaming site), making them hold credibility with their opinions. Besides you don’t need a degree in the gaming industry to give your opinion whether or not Xbox Live is worth it.

    [i]Originally posted by Soeun_Lang[/i]
    LMAO!!!!!!!!!You totally got me!!!

    “I never tried Xbox Live”

    “I gave you pretty much an unbiased source. Yahoo answers just have random people answering questions.”

    IF you want credible gaming source then please refer to IGN, Gamespot, 1up, joystiq, or even gamepro.

    [quote]
    [i]Originally posted by agent0o5[/i]
    Well, owning both systems do not make your opinions less bias. It’s apparent you have a love for the Xbox Live. I gave you pretty much an unbiased source. Yahoo answers just have random people answering questions. Most gaming sites depending on which gaming platform they favor will give you bias opinions.

    I never tried Xbox Live, but from what you’ve listed. I rather spend my 50 bucks on sandals. lol. I just don’t see the allure of it. Maybe you have to be an Xbox fanboy because I notice only Xbox fanboy only hardcore ones at least try to justify the 50 dollar a year fee. Hopefully, Sony can come through with their improvements and still stay free. They need to force Microsoft from ripping you guys off with this service.

    [quote]
    [i]Originally posted by Soeun_Lang[/i]
    Me? Bias? lol oh man I am far from a lemming and a cow. I’m a gamer and I play every game. Xbox Live has the most to offer gamers. Far greater numbers of players on Live and far way better interface. I haven’t bashed the PS3 in any way. I actually own a PS3 and judging from what I’ve played. Hands down Xbox Live is the better online experience and what you’ve posted are bias answers. I can easily find “opinions” on a gaming forum and prove to you how bad PSN sucks. Yes, you pay 49.99 a year but if you can’t afford, then you can happily go to PSN, but for the millions of gamers who are on it, they are enjoying it more than any online gaming experience (minus MMORPGs). You play a multiplatform game like Rainbow 6 or Call of Duty and you can easily tell that there are far more number of gamers on Xbox Live than PSN. Thats just the truth.
    [quote]
    [i]Originally posted by agent0o5[/i]
    What you’ve listed is not worth my 50 bucks a year. Actually, some of them are not a ‘good’ thing. Those movie rentals, tv shows, music videos, demos, etc. are all of them free or it’ll cost you more money to buy those features? Microsoft is just milking your money. I’ll rather watch a TV show on my TV. All I have to do is click input or video on my remote to change it from game to television. I can youtube with my laptop etc already so no point. Also, some things you’ve listed on Xbox Live do also exist in the PS3 that you forgot to list, such as more add-on to the games.

    I really don’t see what you see. If you want to PAY for more things you have to PAY FOR later, then good for you. I just want to go online and play. Is there a feature like that on the Xbox 360?

    I gave you that link on yahoo answer to show you more unbiased point of views. You might not notice it but you do have a bias point of view, it makes you sound less credible.

    [quote]
    [i]Originally posted by Soeun_Lang[/i]
    You got to be kidding with PS3’s online play being better than Xbox Live right? lol why are you posting a askyahoo site for a rebuttal? PS3’s online interface is horrible compared to Xbox Live. Xbox Live interface is really simple and intuitive, because everything is integrated into a dashboard. You could be playing a game, watching a movie, listening to music, and then your friend invites you into a game. All you have to do is press the guide button, accept the invite, and then put the disc in. It’ll bring you straight to his game.
    The same goes with voice chats, and messages, they are all integrated into the dash. Yes, you pay 49.99 a year but you get what you paid for.

    Xbox live

    XBLA (demos for every arcade game, classics, and originals)
    XNA
    Movie rentals
    TV shows
    Music Videos
    Original xbox games
    Community videos
    Tournaments
    137+ Demos
    Bigger online community
    In-game invites, messaging, private chat, music, download status.
    Automatic XBLA downloads
    Check friends status eg. what game there playing,what level there on etc…
    Feature rich interface, everythings sorted.
    More add-ons for games.
    Themes, gamerpics
    Download and PLAY demos (no installing)
    ETC ETC….
    SILVER MEMBERS HAVE ALL THESE FEATURES AND MORE BUT CAN’T PLAY GAMES ONLINE.

    PSN

    Free online play
    Website like store
    less content
    weak community
    no in-game features as standard
    online play is less personal
    BS friends list features (short bio, language, name, game playing)
    No official tournaments (that i no of)
    ps1 classics
    original games

    I’m not saying PSN won’t get better but as of right now. Xbox Live owns it! There’s even talks that PSN might redesign the whole online interface too.

    Things might change once PSN add these features though:

    1) In-Game Music and Messaging
    2) In-Game Browser
    3) Download-able movies
    4) Home

    [quote]
    [i]Originally posted by agent0o5[/i]
    I think you did your math wrong. It’s PS3 Online play > Xbox Live.

    There’s really no $49.99 a year fee to play online on the PS3. That’s 50 bucks I can spend somewhere else. That’s a fact. I can play online whenever I feel like it. I would feel stupid if I paid a fee and end up never playing online because I don’t have the time to play.

    Here’s some more opinion, less-bias ones.

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080116030101AAeC2GG

    /quote]

    [Message last modified 02-27-2008 07:24pm by agent0o5]

    [/quote]
    [/quote]

    [Message last modified 02-28-2008 02:58am by agent0o5]

    #290225
    Profile photo of RotaryBoy
    RotaryBoy
    Participant
    • Posts: 8271

    haha this threads are going crazy. Imma jump in and say

    Xbox2 and PS3 , if you spend 300+ bucks on a system, plus the games, plus extra controller, you guys are dotards.

    When the ‘new’ systems came out, I spent 50 bucks on a wiimote.

    I bring my wiimote to my friend’s house. if my battery drain I ask them for some. my brother got a battery charger.

    I play GH and Rockband at my friend’s house. I watch blu-ray stuff at my friends house.

    And when I wanna play game, I hope on to my computer and play a free online MMORPG. Why pay to play online? Why pay for a game system? why pay for a ‘dvd’ system’? I can do everything on my 4 year old computer.

    it just cost me electricity and internet. I spend money on games or gaming accessories. wait I bought a controller. other than that, I’m all good.

    frankly, it doesn’t matter what you guys think. it’s all about sales figure and the number should just shut both of you up.

    other than that you are just comparing your views on what you think is better. no matter what you said, what you guys think is better doesn’t mean it is better.

    IMO, there was a dude that kill his kid because that baby knocked over the xbox2. Now I don’t know if ps3 cause any death but if a game console that give you the RROD can cause a man to kill his own kid, that console must be the ultimate game console.

    hahahah this is r-tarded.

    #290236
    Profile photo of
    Anonymous
    • Posts: 7768

    Are you saying your friends who you go to and play their Xbox 360, Nintendo Wii, and PS3, dotards as well? I hope they know that.

    For me, I will spend the money on something if it’s worth it. If the Xbox Live gave me free downloadable music or tv shows for the $50 fee, then I would say it’s worth it. All it adds is meaningless features I can live without.

    And yes, thank you for pointing out the obvious that what we are stating are opinions and not facts.

    [i]Originally posted by RotaryBoy[/i]
    haha this threads are going crazy. Imma jump in and say

    Xbox2 and PS3 , if you spend 300+ bucks on a system, plus the games, plus extra controller, you guys are dotards.

    When the ‘new’ systems came out, I spent 50 bucks on a wiimote.

    I bring my wiimote to my friend’s house. if my battery drain I ask them for some. my brother got a battery charger.

    I play GH and Rockband at my friend’s house. I watch blu-ray stuff at my friends house.

    And when I wanna play game, I hope on to my computer and play a free online MMORPG. Why pay to play online? Why pay for a game system? why pay for a ‘dvd’ system’? I can do everything on my 4 year old computer.

    it just cost me electricity and internet. I spend money on games or gaming accessories. wait I bought a controller. other than that, I’m all good.

    frankly, it doesn’t matter what you guys think. it’s all about sales figure and the number should just shut both of you up.

    other than that you are just comparing your views on what you think is better. no matter what you said, what you guys think is better doesn’t mean it is better.

    IMO, there was a dude that kill his kid because that baby knocked over the xbox2. Now I don’t know if ps3 cause any death but if a game console that give you the RROD can cause a man to kill his own kid, that console must be the ultimate game console.

    hahahah this is r-tarded.

    #290249
    Profile photo of Soeun_Lang
    Soeun_Lang
    Participant
    • Posts: 423

    IF you wanna talk about sales figures then Xbox 360 hands down in terms of hardware sales, software sales and number of players online, so maybe you got to shut up?

    This thread is about Xbox360 vs. PS3 and there is nothing dotarded about spending that much money on a system.

    Thats very cool that you go to your friend’s house and play their games and there is a monthly fee to play MMORPG online on certains games like World of Warcraft and etc. Do you want a cookie or something to be able to play everything on your 4 year old computer? This thread again is about Xbox360 vs. PS3 and Agent and I can debate this all we want.

    That guy must be a real dumbass to kill his own kid over the RROD and you must be real “smart” to think that the xbox is the cause of this.

    [i]Originally posted by RotaryBoy[/i]
    haha this threads are going crazy. Imma jump in and say

    Xbox2 and PS3 , if you spend 300+ bucks on a system, plus the games, plus extra controller, you guys are dotards.

    When the ‘new’ systems came out, I spent 50 bucks on a wiimote.

    I bring my wiimote to my friend’s house. if my battery drain I ask them for some. my brother got a battery charger.

    I play GH and Rockband at my friend’s house. I watch blu-ray stuff at my friends house.

    And when I wanna play game, I hope on to my computer and play a free online MMORPG. Why pay to play online? Why pay for a game system? why pay for a ‘dvd’ system’? I can do everything on my 4 year old computer.

    it just cost me electricity and internet. I spend money on games or gaming accessories. wait I bought a controller. other than that, I’m all good.

    frankly, it doesn’t matter what you guys think. it’s all about sales figure and the number should just shut both of you up.

    other than that you are just comparing your views on what you think is better. no matter what you said, what you guys think is better doesn’t mean it is better.

    IMO, there was a dude that kill his kid because that baby knocked over the xbox2. Now I don’t know if ps3 cause any death but if a game console that give you the RROD can cause a man to kill his own kid, that console must be the ultimate game console.

    hahahah this is r-tarded.

    #290261
    Profile photo of RotaryBoy
    RotaryBoy
    Participant
    • Posts: 8271

    hahahah you guys funny. I got me wii mote ready, where can we meet to play some wiii sport :D don’t forget the cookies, I’ll bring the milk , chocolate milk, yo.

    #290273
    Profile photo of
    Anonymous
    • Posts: 7768

    You should just buy a Nintendo Wii if you like it so much. My Nintendo Wii has been sitting in my closet, and I have two of them. I am waiting for them to announce a title that’s worthwhile besides SSB, but not yet, thinking about ebaying, but ebay buyers are cheap ass mofo.

    [i]Originally posted by RotaryBoy[/i]
    hahahah you guys funny. I got me wii mote ready, where can we meet to play some wiii sport :D don’t forget the cookies, I’ll bring the milk , chocolate milk, yo.

    #290284
    Profile photo of RotaryBoy
    RotaryBoy
    Participant
    • Posts: 8271

    No need. My brother doesn’t use his wii, he still play xbox 1. He only bought it for Zelda. So use his wii. my other brother got gamefly, so I”m just renting game for it.

    I have more fun with the wii at my friends house anyway. They don’t even use their wii until a bunch of friends come over anyway.

    I also got the wii setup with orb on the desktop so I can watch download movies on the bigger screen. It’s nice. after my brother saw that, he wanted the wii back but realize he already got a modded xbox with movies stored in the hd 0-o.

    Why you have two of them?

    [i]Originally posted by agent0o5[/i]
    You should just buy a Nintendo Wii if you like it so much. My Nintendo Wii has been sitting in my closet, and I have two of them. I am waiting for them to announce a title that’s worthwhile besides SSB, but not yet, thinking about ebaying, but ebay buyers are cheap ass mofo.

    #290295
    Profile photo of
    Anonymous
    • Posts: 7768

    Planned to give it as a gift. You know how hard it is to get a Nintendo Wii because Nintendo intentionally makes a shortage amount.

    I have the Xbox 1 also, and got all the raving reviewed games. They were disappointing.

    edit: Oh, I use blu-ray on the big screen hdtv. Way better than any d/l movie. I would never pay for downloaded movie. And with downloaded movies, I just connect my laptop or/and desktop to the TV. I haven’t heard of orb before sounds interesting. There might be a use for my Nintendo Wii, thanks for the info.

    [i]Originally posted by RotaryBoy[/i]
    No need. My brother doesn’t use his wii, he still play xbox 1. He only bought it for Zelda. So use his wii. my other brother got gamefly, so I”m just renting game for it.

    I have more fun with the wii at my friends house anyway. They don’t even use their wii until a bunch of friends come over anyway.

    I also got the wii setup with orb on the desktop so I can watch download movies on the bigger screen. It’s nice. after my brother saw that, he wanted the wii back but realize he already got a modded xbox with movies stored in the hd 0-o.

    Why you have two of them?

    [Message last modified 02-29-2008 12:16pm by agent0o5]

    #290306
    Profile photo of
    Anonymous
    • Posts: 7768

    Here’s a recent sales figure for January 2008:

    * Wii – 274,000
    * PlayStation 3 – 269,000
    * PlayStation 2 – 264,000
    * Nintendo DS – 251,000
    * PlayStation Portable – 230,000
    * Xbox 360 – 230,000

    http://kotaku.com/356776/playstation-3-outsells-xbox-360-ds-in-january

    Sony and Nintendo are doing pretty well. Even the PS2 is selling better than the Xbox 360 (yes, I know about the so-called Xbox 360 shortage. Nintendo Wii had shortage period, but still did well). Wonder how the Xbox original one is doing? Can’t wait to see February’s figures.

    Originally posted by RotaryBoy
    frankly, it doesn’t matter what you guys think. it’s all about sales figure and the number should just shut both of you up.

    [Message last modified 02-29-2008 07:29pm by agent0o5]

    #290319
    Profile photo of khalir
    khalir
    Participant
    • Posts: 84

    [i]Originally posted by agent0o5[/i]
    Here’s a recent sales figure for January 2008:

    * Wii – 274,000
    * PlayStation 3 – 269,000
    * PlayStation 2 – 264,000
    * Nintendo DS – 251,000
    * PlayStation Portable – 230,000
    * Xbox 360 – 230,000

    http://kotaku.com/356776/playstation-3-outsells-xbox-360-ds-in-january

    Sony and Nintendo are doing pretty well. Even the PS2 is selling better than the Xbox 360 ([i]yes, I know about the so-called Xbox 360 shortage. Nintendo Wii had shortage period, but still did well[/i]). Wonder how the Xbox original one is doing? Can’t wait to see February’s figures.
    [Message last modified 02-29-2008 07:29pm by agent0o5]

    ha-ha-ha-ha. that’s cute agent. show only the numbers when the ps3 tops the 360 in terms of sales. remember how sony blasted microsoft for launching the 360 with 2 skus? now how stupid does sony look now? how man sku’s have the introduced and cancelled?!! how sony blasted the 360 for using the rumble and how it was old technology? if so, then explain why they are bringing the dualshock3 to us?!! you sony ps3 fanboys are stoopid for falling for the stupid lies.

    oh, and here are the REAL sales figures by the folks at NPD:

    PlayStation 2 – 41,120,000
    Game Boy Advance – 36,240,000
    Nintendo DS – 17,650,000
    PSP – 10,470,000
    Xbox 360 – 9,150,000
    Wii – 7,380,000
    PlayStation 3 – 3,250,000

    yes, that’s right. OVERALL consoles sales, and the ps3 is going to need more than january’s sales figure to catch up. oh, and you left out one of the true statistics of how well a console is doing: THE ATTACH RATES. more people buy games and accessories for the 360 then ps3 or wii owners do for their respective consoles.

    anyway, long live the 360. long live the wii. long live the ps3. long live gaming. i’m glad microsoft filled in the void after my beloved sega left.

    #290330
    Profile photo of
    Anonymous
    • Posts: 7768

    The figures you gave is just American figures. But if you want to see the REAL overall figures, here they are:

    http://nexgenwars.com/

    The January figures suppose to tell you how much better the PS3 is doing the beginning of this year than the Xbox 360. The PS3 still needs to catch up, but the leader is not the Xbox 360 but rather the Nintendo Wii.

    But you know what’s funny about the Xbox 360, they’re not selling as well outside of America. For example, only 548k Xbox 360 in Japan vs 1.67 million PS3 in Japan. Why is that? I thought they had better games? I would think the Japanese customers would know a thing or two about ‘better’ games.

    I would like to know the figures in Europe on the Xbox though, but don’t have it. I’m pretty sure it’s not as great as it is in America since Americans shares is more than half for the Xbox 360 (9.15M out of 18M worldwide). It seems like it’s an American thing to buy Xbox 360… what because it’s “made” by Microsoft, an American company? I heard they wanted to manufacture HD-DVD in China. I wonder if that’s the reason why the Xbox 360 gives RROD because they were probably cheaply made by the cheap companies in other countries?

    [i]Originally posted by khalir[/i]
    [quote]
    [i]Originally posted by agent0o5[/i]
    Here’s a recent sales figure for January 2008:

    * Wii – 274,000
    * PlayStation 3 – 269,000
    * PlayStation 2 – 264,000
    * Nintendo DS – 251,000
    * PlayStation Portable – 230,000
    * Xbox 360 – 230,000

    http://kotaku.com/356776/playstation-3-outsells-xbox-360-ds-in-january

    Sony and Nintendo are doing pretty well. Even the PS2 is selling better than the Xbox 360 ([i]yes, I know about the so-called Xbox 360 shortage. Nintendo Wii had shortage period, but still did well[/i]). Wonder how the Xbox original one is doing? Can’t wait to see February’s figures.
    [Message last modified 02-29-2008 07:29pm by agent0o5]

    ha-ha-ha-ha. that’s cute agent. show only the numbers when the ps3 tops the 360 in terms of sales. remember how sony blasted microsoft for launching the 360 with 2 skus? now how stupid does sony look now? how man sku’s have the introduced and cancelled?!! how sony blasted the 360 for using the rumble and how it was old technology? if so, then explain why they are bringing the dualshock3 to us?!! you sony ps3 fanboys are stoopid for falling for the stupid lies.

    oh, and here are the REAL sales figures by the folks at NPD:

    PlayStation 2 – 41,120,000
    Game Boy Advance – 36,240,000
    Nintendo DS – 17,650,000
    PSP – 10,470,000
    Xbox 360 – 9,150,000
    Wii – 7,380,000
    PlayStation 3 – 3,250,000

    yes, that’s right. OVERALL consoles sales, and the ps3 is going to need more than january’s sales figure to catch up. oh, and you left out one of the true statistics of how well a console is doing: THE ATTACH RATES. more people buy games and accessories for the 360 then ps3 or wii owners do for their respective consoles.

    anyway, long live the 360. long live the wii. long live the ps3. long live gaming. i’m glad microsoft filled in the void after my beloved sega left. [/quote]

    [Message last modified 03-03-2008 01:48am by agent0o5]

    #290342
    Profile photo of RotaryBoy
    RotaryBoy
    Participant
    • Posts: 8271

    hahah I thought the same thing. after the dreamcast died, I felt like xbox was the stepping up to take it’s place.

    [i]Originally posted by khalir[/i]

    i’m glad microsoft filled in the void after my beloved sega left.

    #290352
    Profile photo of RotaryBoy
    RotaryBoy
    Participant
    • Posts: 8271

    ps 2 rocks.

    I have a lot of games for ps1 and ps2… hopefully ps3 can play ps1/2 games…

    I was playing on my friend’s ps3. playing assisin creed. I know they got it for the xbox2 also. but I like how I can create different profile on the console.

    between xbox2 and ps3, when I decide to buy a system. I’ll go with ps3 mainly for the blu ray and because xbox2 crashes. I will NOT pay for somethign that has a high rate of failure. unless it was something I got from the dollar store

    #290363
    Profile photo of Soeun_Lang
    Soeun_Lang
    Participant
    • Posts: 423

    lol oh wow now we got to include the wii in this xbox360 vs. ps3 thread. lets not get off topic here! we’re simply comparing the xbox 360 to the ps3 and in terms of hardware sales and software sales xbox360 owns ps3. wow sony fanboys are so desperate lol. who cares about japan? we live here in the states. sony fanboys always bring up the japan card.

    [i]Originally posted by agent0o5[/i]
    The figures you gave is just American figures. But if you want to see the REAL overall figures, here they are:

    http://nexgenwars.com/

    The January figures suppose to tell you how much better the PS3 is doing the beginning of this year than the Xbox 360. The PS3 still needs to catch up, but the leader is not the Xbox 360 but rather the Nintendo Wii.

    But you know what’s funny about the Xbox 360, they’re not selling as well outside of America. For example, only 548k Xbox 360 in Japan vs 1.67 million PS3 in Japan. Why is that? I thought they had better games? I would think the Japanese customers would know a thing or two about ‘better’ games.

    I would like to know the figures in Europe on the Xbox though, but don’t have it. I’m pretty sure it’s not as great as it is in America since Americans shares is more than half for the Xbox 360 (9.15M out of 18M worldwide). It seems like it’s an American thing to buy Xbox 360… what because it’s “made” by Microsoft, an American company? I heard they wanted to manufacture HD-DVD in China. I wonder if that’s the reason why the Xbox 360 gives RROD because they were probably cheaply made by the cheap companies in other countries?

    [quote]
    [i]Originally posted by khalir[/i]
    [quote]
    [i]Originally posted by agent0o5[/i]
    Here’s a recent sales figure for January 2008:

    * Wii – 274,000
    * PlayStation 3 – 269,000
    * PlayStation 2 – 264,000
    * Nintendo DS – 251,000
    * PlayStation Portable – 230,000
    * Xbox 360 – 230,000

    http://kotaku.com/356776/playstation-3-outsells-xbox-360-ds-in-january

    Sony and Nintendo are doing pretty well. Even the PS2 is selling better than the Xbox 360 ([i]yes, I know about the so-called Xbox 360 shortage. Nintendo Wii had shortage period, but still did well[/i]). Wonder how the Xbox original one is doing? Can’t wait to see February’s figures.
    [Message last modified 02-29-2008 07:29pm by agent0o5]

    ha-ha-ha-ha. that’s cute agent. show only the numbers when the ps3 tops the 360 in terms of sales. remember how sony blasted microsoft for launching the 360 with 2 skus? now how stupid does sony look now? how man sku’s have the introduced and cancelled?!! how sony blasted the 360 for using the rumble and how it was old technology? if so, then explain why they are bringing the dualshock3 to us?!! you sony ps3 fanboys are stoopid for falling for the stupid lies.

    oh, and here are the REAL sales figures by the folks at NPD:

    PlayStation 2 – 41,120,000
    Game Boy Advance – 36,240,000
    Nintendo DS – 17,650,000
    PSP – 10,470,000
    Xbox 360 – 9,150,000
    Wii – 7,380,000
    PlayStation 3 – 3,250,000

    yes, that’s right. OVERALL consoles sales, and the ps3 is going to need more than january’s sales figure to catch up. oh, and you left out one of the true statistics of how well a console is doing: THE ATTACH RATES. more people buy games and accessories for the 360 then ps3 or wii owners do for their respective consoles.

    anyway, long live the 360. long live the wii. long live the ps3. long live gaming. i’m glad microsoft filled in the void after my beloved sega left. [/quote]

    [Message last modified 03-03-2008 01:48am by agent0o5][/quote]

    #290375
    Profile photo of
    Anonymous
    • Posts: 7768

    Apparently, your beloved Microsoft does. They are trying though but the Japanese know better. People who play games developed by Japanese developers also care. Unless you only play FPS and RPG made by American? The Japanese market is a big part of this console war. I think part of the reason why the Xbox original isn’t doing as well as the PS2 is because the Xbox original never really did well globally, especially in Japan. It lacked the Japanese developers game. Mostly crappy FPS games and just ninja gaiden? lol.

    Don’t worry about PS3 software sales; they haven’t gotten started yet. What titles are Xbox 360 fan boys like you looking forward to? The next Blu-Ray add-on. haha.

    [i]Originally posted by Soeun_Lang[/i]
    [b] who cares about japan?[/b]

    #290385
    Profile photo of
    Anonymous
    • Posts: 7768

    Soeun_Lang, I hope you like this news:

    [b]PS3 Sold Faster Than Xbox 360 In Same Period[/b]
    02/20/2008
    In a recent report released by VG Chartz, it was found that the [b]Playstation 3 sold better in its first 14 months than the Xbox 360 did during the same period.[/b] According to VG Chartz, the Xbox 360 took four months longer to hit the 10 million units sold mark in its cycle than the PS3, which hit 10 million units worldwide in January. [b]The numbers also show that the PS3 has been selling more consistently
    worldwide, rather than the Xbox 360’s predominate strength in the North American market.[/b] February is turning out to be a whole host of good announcements for the PS3!

    http://www.gamepro.com/news.cfm?article_id=162608

    http://kotaku.com/358655/ps3-sold-faster-than-xbox-360-in-same-period

    who care about Japan huh? You mean who cares about America if you’re talking about the Xbox 360 because it also needs to do better worldwide. As you can see, it’s worldwide sales that really count. Microsoft’s lost in HD format war is definitely going to hurt them even more.

    [Message last modified 03-05-2008 11:50pm by agent0o5]

    #290396
    Profile photo of Soeun_Lang
    Soeun_Lang
    Participant
    • Posts: 423

    Microsoft may care about Japan, But I as a consumer don’t. I just want games and hey if it means more RPGS then I am for it, but I can care less right now, because I am happy with the games I have right now.

    BTW I am looking forward to a whole bunch of games for the 360 as well as the PS3 and I welcome the Blu-Ray add on.

    But the arguement is with terms of sales and 360 hands down owns ps3 right now. case closed fanboy!!!! you even posted a friggin link to it, but yet you want to compare the wii to it when this thread is about ps3 and xbox360. stop your crying about ps3 laggin in overall sales and play your damn ps3 instead of posting useless, misleading sales info.

    Thread says: XBOX vs. PS3

    NOT

    XBOX vs. PS3 vs. WII

    I don’t now how simpler i can get!!!

    [i]Originally posted by agent0o5[/i]
    Apparently, your beloved Microsoft does. They are trying though but the Japanese know better. People who play games developed by Japanese developers also care. Unless you only play FPS and RPG made by American? The Japanese market is a big part of this console war. I think part of the reason why the Xbox original isn’t doing as well as the PS2 is because the Xbox original never really did well globally, especially in Japan. It lacked the Japanese developers game. Mostly crappy FPS games and just ninja gaiden? lol.

    Don’t worry about PS3 software sales; they haven’t gotten started yet. What titles are Xbox 360 fan boys like you looking forward to? The next Blu-Ray add-on. haha.

    [quote]
    [i]Originally posted by Soeun_Lang[/i]
    [b] who cares about japan?[/b]

    [/quote]

    #290408
    Profile photo of
    Anonymous
    • Posts: 7768

    For some reason, I highly doubt you own a PS3. But if you do, I suggest you sell your Xbox 360. There’s no games on there that’s not also in either the PS3 or a PC. Do it before you get the RROD. lol.

    As a consumer I care about Japan, I don’t want to end up just playing ninja gaiden.

    Funny how my facts are useless when it doesn’t support your beloved Xbox 360? haha.

    And don’t worry if I’m playing my PS3 or not. I don’t have to pay to play a game I already paid for. Why don’t you stop defending your beloved Microsoft and go play your Xbox 360 because you’re wasting your $49.99 fee.

    Originally posted by Soeun_Lang
    Microsoft may care about Japan, But I as a consumer don’t. I just want games and hey if it means more RPGS then I am for it, but I can care less right now, because I am happy with the games I have right now.

    BTW I am looking forward to a whole bunch of games for the 360 as well as the PS3 and I welcome the Blu-Ray add on.

    But the arguement is with terms of sales and 360 hands down owns ps3 right now. case closed fanboy!!!! you even posted a friggin link to it, but yet you want to compare the wii to it when this thread is about ps3 and xbox360. stop your crying about ps3 laggin in overall sales and play your damn ps3 instead of posting useless, misleading sales info.

    Thread says: XBOX vs. PS3

    NOT

    XBOX vs. PS3 vs. WII

    I don’t now how simpler i can get!!!
    /quote]

    [Message last modified 03-06-2008 12:48am by agent0o5]

    #290418
    Profile photo of Soeun_Lang
    Soeun_Lang
    Participant
    • Posts: 423

    LMAO!!!

    Give up fan boy. In the market where you and I live:

    Xbox 360: 11.11 million consoles sold
    PS3:4.18 million consoles sold

    This is from your source VGchartz.

    For crying out loud look at the software sales!

    It sucks that I have to defend 360 to a sony fanboy here, because I also own and play the PS3 but can’t help it when my good friend agent is infected with a deadly virus called fanboyism. This thread was started by a person who wants to know which console is better in terms of gameplay and graphics and yet we have my poor friend agent being really defensive here with other ppl when they only wanted to point out the truth, yet he can’t handle the truth.

    Here is my final judgement of the PS3 and Xbox360:

    Games available: Xbox360
    Which multi-platform title looks and plays better: Xbox 360 (might change later)
    In-game and online features: Xbox 360 (you do have to pay 5 bucks a month for xbox live)

    Better system: PS3 (graphics capabilities) although no developer has taken advantage of that yet
    Better Hardware features: PS3

    Look at all my threads and look at all my posts. I have never once bashed PS3, yet he still claims i’m a xbox fanboy. I like my 360 and PS3. I only pointed out what was the truth and hey if i was wrong i’ll admit it. This will be my last reply and hopefully when I come back my poor friend agent will recover from that dreadful disease. Best of luck to ya!

    BTW. Pick up MLB 08: The Show if you are a sports gamer. That game is the truth! BTW its only for PS3!!!

    XBL Gamertag: Soeunster
    PSN: Soeun or Soeunster (can’t remember since i’m never online with my ps3)

    [i]Originally posted by agent0o5[/i]
    Soeun_Lang, I hope you like this news:

    [quote]

    [b]PS3 Sold Faster Than Xbox 360 In Same Period[/b]
    02/20/2008
    In a recent report released by VG Chartz, it was found that the [b]Playstation 3 sold better in its first 14 months than the Xbox 360 did during the same period.[/b] According to VG Chartz, the Xbox 360 took four months longer to hit the 10 million units sold mark in its cycle than the PS3, which hit 10 million units worldwide in January. [b]The numbers also show that the PS3 has been selling more consistently
    worldwide, rather than the Xbox 360’s predominate strength in the North American market.[/b] February is turning out to be a whole host of good announcements for the PS3!

    http://www.gamepro.com/news.cfm?article_id=162608

    http://kotaku.com/358655/ps3-sold-faster-than-xbox-360-in-same-period

    who care about Japan huh? You mean who cares about America if you’re talking about the Xbox 360 because it also needs to do better worldwide. As you can see, it’s worldwide sales that really count. Microsoft’s lost in HD format war is definitely going to hurt them even more.

    [Message last modified 03-05-2008 11:50pm by agent0o5][/quote]

    [Message last modified 03-06-2008 02:02am by Soeun_Lang]

    #290429
    Profile photo of
    Anonymous
    • Posts: 7768

    There’s a reason why you don’t bash the PS3. There’s nothing to really bash about it except its price compared to the Xbox 360, but that doesn’t even matter considering all the “add-ons” you have to pay for including the 49.99 fee and the HD-DVD that doesn’t work anymore for the Xbox 360. If I remember correctly, you even need to buy a damn add-on to do wireless internet. PS3 comes with wifi. Nintendo Wii comes with wifi. Besides that, buying a PS3 is a deal if you’re going to buy it for Blu-Ray, and you get a technically superior system to the Xbox 360.

    The reason I bash on the Xbox 360 is because there’s A LOT of reasons to bash on it. There’s the RROD because they’re cheaply manufactured. There’s the HD-DVD debacle where they left their 300,000 customers with a useless add-on. There’s the 49.99 yearly fee just so you can play a game you already paid for so you can have ‘extra’ features that basically not even worth it. There’s only FPS games for that crappy system. There’s the part where they are only doing well in America, meaning less developers for it. There’s Microsoft!

    There’s so many problems with it that I have no clue why you’re defending it. I really think only a Xbox fan boy would defend that crappy system. Even Xbox 360 owners wouldn’t defend it after it gave them RROD.

    I could care less if Sony does well or not. I’m just happy that Microsoft is doing poorly. lol. Microsoft has no business in the gaming industry. Just like it had no business in the HD format war. They need to stick to making softwares not hardwares. Even that they suck, look at Vista. lol.

    [i]Originally posted by Soeun_Lang[/i]

    Look at all my threads and look at all my posts. I have never once bashed PS3, yet he still claims i’m a xbox fanboy. I like my 360 and PS3. I only pointed out what was the truth and hey if i was wrong i’ll admit it. This will be my last reply and hopefully when I come back my poor friend agent will recover from that dreadful disease. Best of luck to ya!

    #290440
    Profile photo of RotaryBoy
    RotaryBoy
    Participant
    • Posts: 8271

    you also forgot to mention that the xbox elite, that has a small chip was in order to prevent the RROD has it’s own problem. Ppl complain abou tthe cd drive spinning soooo fast that it shatter their games.

    I really want to buy an xbox 2 to play games with my friend, but there is soooooooo many freakin problem with it.

    I guess by the numbers, American are stupid for buying crappy products. Or maybe the ppl’s standard are lower than the world…

    Like agent said, the only flaw with ps3 is the price… that’s the only thing stopping me from buying it.

Viewing 25 posts - 51 through 75 (of 85 total)